IBC No Role of COC play as a claimant whose matters had to be determined by liquidator

No Role of COC play as a claimant whose matters had to be determined by liquidator

No Role of COC play as a claimant whose matters had to be determined by liquidator

IBC : Realisation & Distribution of Assets by Liquidator

Liquidation under the IBC 2016 with special focus upon priority of claims : 

  • Under section 53(1) of the Insolvency Code, 2016, the fees payable to the liquidator shall be deducted proportionately from the proceeds payable to each class of recipients, and the proceeds to the applicable recipient shall be dispersed after such deduction.
  • Both the IBC and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 (hence referred to as the "Liquidation Regulations") deal with the process of corporate debtor liquidation.
  • A liquidator is appointed by the Adjudicating Authority to carry out the liquidation procedure. Once the corporate debtor's liquidation procedure has begun, its assets will be sold and dispersed among creditors, workers, shareholders, partners, and others in the sequence of priority established by the Code. The most essential part of the liquidation procedure is the distribution of the net proceeds of the corporate debtor's assets according to priority. The "waterfall mechanism" is another name for the priority order.

After liquidation, COC had no role to play as a claimant whose matters had to be determined by the liquidator.

COC cannot move an application for his removal. The COC has no role to play and that they are simply claimants,

 IBC:  just after liquidation order, COC had no part to play as they were merely a complainant whose matters were to be decided by the liquidator and thus could not push a request for the dismissal of the liquidator in the absence of any legal provision

The lead bank in the COC challenged the appointment of the liquidator after the AA passed the liquidation order. The NCLAT held that after the liquidation order, the COC has no role to play and that they are simply claimants, whose matters are to be determined by the liquidator and hence cannot move an application for his removal.

  • 21.01.2020 In the ‘CIRP ’ of ‘M/s. ORG Informatics Limited’- (‘Corporate Debtor’), the 'Creditors Committee' of which the 'Punjab National Bank' is the lead creditor, agreed to push an application to wind up the 'Corporate Debtor' debtor.
  • Pursuant to Sections 33 & 34 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the 'Resolution Specialist' was asked to push wind-up demand. By impugned order of 20 November 2019 the said application was accepted by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Ahmedabad Bench, Ahmedabad. The 'Qualified Settlement' was asked to act as a liquidator.
  • The Appellant's argument is that he is against the Liquidator's appointment. However, we are not inclined to intervene with the impugned order as the 'Committee of Creditors' has no role to play after the liquidation and they are merely a complainant whose matters are to be decided by the liquidator and cannot push motion for dismissal of the liquidator in the absence of any provisions under the law.
  • We do not find any merit in that appeal. It is also discontinued. Few costs.

TDS Not Required U/s 194-IA on sale of Property under Liquidator- IBC 

In the present case, the Appellant Liquidator lodged an appeal against the order passed by the NCLT refusing to issue instructions to the successful bidder and the Tax Authority not to deduct 1% of TDS u/s 194IA on the sale consideration.

Required to adhere to the IBC Act 2016 proceedings, an auction was held for the sale of assets of Corporate Debtors.

Income Tax Law stated U/s 194IA of the Act, the purchaser of immovable property is needed to deduct TDS @ 1 % of sale value where INR has exceeded 50 lakhs or more.

In view of the above requirement of the Income-tax Act 1961, the Liquidator filed an application before the NCLT for direction against the successful bidder and the Income Tax Authority not to deduct 1 % of the TDS from the sale Value receiving on the assumption that the Income Tax Duties may be recovered by the Income Tax Department under the waterfall system stated as per provision of section 53 of the IBC 2016, which deals with the distribution of the proceeds from the sale.

It was argued that the provision for the deduction of tax deducted at source under section 194IA, of Act, is inconsistent with Section 53(1)(e) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 & according to the provision of Section 238 of the Code, Section 53 of the Code has an overriding effect.

Fortunately, the Honorable Court- NCLT held that the deduction of TDS U/s 194-IA does not imply an assessment & increase of the Income-tax Dept's demand for tax collection. Consequently, the Honorable Court - NCLAT rejected the application, 

Honorable Court - NCLAT focused on the  below Question of law;
'Whether the provisions of U/S 194—IA of the Tax law are inconsistent with Section 53(1)(e) of IBC code? ”

Honorable Court - NCLAT concluded the amendment constructed of Section 178(6) of the Income-tax Act 1961 w.e.f 01/11/2016, which provides the provisions of the IBC Code an overriding effect on the Liquidator's tax liability for the company under Liquidation.

Honorable Court - NCLAT argued that, as a result of the amendment, whole Section 178 had no application for liquidation proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

In addition, Section 45 of the IT Act provides that any profits or gains arising from the transfer of capital assets are to be charged to Income Tax on capital gains. Thus, Tax deducted at Souses u/s 194 IA is nothing more than the advance capital gain tax collected by the transferee (purchaser) on behalf of the transferor (seller).

The NCLAT responded by pointing out that, pursuant to Section 194 IA of the IT Act, 1 percent of the TDS is recovered as a primary consideration to the other creditors of the transferor, which is a partial capital gain tax, whereas Section 53(1)(e) of the Waterfall Code provides that the government fees are the fifth priority.

The NCLAT contended that the Liquidator of a Company in liquidation under the Code is not allowed to submit the Income Tax Return, and there is no issue of claiming the refund of the TDS deducted under Section 194 IA of the IT Act.

In addition, NCLAT noted that pursuant to the provisions of the Income-tax Refund under the Income-tax law,  it is a cumbersome process to withdraw the refund from the Income Tax Department, & therefore IBC Code & IBBI (Liquidator Process) Regulation 2016 are silent on this matter of filing the ITR Return as the Code provides for a time-limited time frame for the finalization and maximization of the value of assets & the cessation of the biz.

In reply to the question put forward for the benefit of the appellant, the NCLAT held that Section 194-IA did not comply with the terms of Section 53(1)(e) of the Code and, pursuant to Section 238 of the Code, the provisions of Section 53(1)(e) had an overriding effect.

The contested order of the NCLT is thus set aside as not legally self-sustaining. The Tax Dept. was instructed to refund the number of TDS that had been deposited with the appellant & the appeal was allowed in the favour of the appellant.

Total Details of  CIRPs resulted into liquidation as on 30.09.2021.

IBBI released data of CIRPs resulted into liquidation as on 30.09.2021 (Since IBC came in force), Total admitted claims of INR 7414 Billions in 1423 Corporate Debtors. Resolution plans received only in 296 cases. Link 

Popular Article : 

Rajput Jain & Associates

www.carajput.com

Disclaimer: The content of this post isn't considered to be professional or legal advice, We aren't responsible for any damages arising from your access to the location content & must not be relied on or used as a substitute for legal advice from a lawyer professional in your jurisdiction. CARajput is among India's big digital compliance services platform which committed to helping people have started & developed their businesses. We had started with the goal of creating it easier for start-ups to start out their business. Our main aim is to assist the businessman with applicable laws & regulations compliance and providing support at each & every level to make sure the business stays compliant and growing continuously. For any query, help or feedback you may in touch on singh@carajput.com or Call or what’s-up on 9-555-555-480

Share This Post

Related Articles

Related Videos


Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 | Issues & Concerns| How it is form

Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, Act 2016 | Issues & Concerns| How it is form 

Published On: Jan 23, 2022 | By: RJA


Meaning of Pre Pack Insolvency | Benefits of pre packs | Pre Pack Insolvency

Meaning of Pre Pack Insolvency | Benefits of pre-packs | Pre Pack Insolvency 

 

Published On: Jan 31, 2022 | By: RJA


Fast Track Insolvency: Fast-Track Insolvency Resolution Procedure | What is Fast Track process?

Fast Track Insolvency: Fast-Track Insolvency Resolution Procedure | What is Fast Track process?

Published On: Jan 12, 2022 | By: RJA


What is Personal Guarantor? | What is the meaning of Personal Guarantor?

What is Personal Guarantor? | What are meaning Of Personal Guarantor? | Insolvency Process against Personal Gaurantor to Corporate Debtor.

Published On: Nov 14, 2021 | By: RJA

Need help?

Request a call
from a RJA
Business Advisor.

LET'S TALK

Private Limited Company

Popular Categories

Browse Blogs

Recent Posts

Functions & Features of Wholly Owned Subsidiary in India.

Functions & Features of Wholly Owned Subsidiary in India.

Online ITR submitting Due Dates for AY 2022-23 (update)

Online ITR submitting Due Dates for AY 2022-23 (update)

CBIC examine crypto ecosystem to bring more activities on GST framework

CBIC examine crypto ecosystem to bring more activities on GST framework

Extension of tax returns filing deadline for AY 2022–23 till 31st Aug 2022

Extension of tax returns filing deadline for AY 2022–23 till 31st Aug 2022

Taxpayer compulsory submit the correct HSN codes in GSTR-1: GSTN Advisory

Taxpayer compulsory submit the correct HSN codes in GSTR-1: GSTN Advisory

Connect with a RJA Advisor

Fields marked with an * are required

Enquire Us

Please send us your query and we feel very happy helping you

Testimonials

  • Thank you very much for all your help in setting up my new company and clearing up all outstanding business in my sole trader accounts. For the first time in years I have peace of mind regards my business accounts. Your workforce are a credit to you, the girls at reception are so helpful and Chris has been brilliant. It is very much appreciated.

    A US consultancy group

  • Rajput Jain & Associates. are a tremendous value added to me as an executive and a busy parent. It just makes sense to delegate my tax file to them -- they are proactive, extremely service oriented, and most importantly, I am completely confident they are finding every dollar of tax savings available to me.

    A Leading Service Provider

  • We use Rajput Jain & Associates for all our accounting, Corporation tax, VAT and other compliance needs. The service is professional, courteous and prompt. I would recommend Rajput Jain & Associates to any company requiring a comprehensive accounting and tax service.

    A Leading Consultancy Firm in Dubai

Money Back Guarantee

Not happy with the service? You can request a refund at anytime within 30 days!

24/7 Support

Get support through phone, email, mobile app or live chat - 24/7, 365 days.

EMI Payment

Easily pay online with EMI payments, credit or debit card, net banking, PayPal and more.

Legal Disclaimer--

The information contained on this website merely provides details of our firm to persons who have shown interest in knowing more about us and is not intended to solicit work or advertise our capabilities in any manner. The information provided on this website is general in nature and should not be used as a basis of decision-making without further professional advice. The third party site links are only provided for ready reference of the users and CA Rajput Jain & Associates neither controls their content nor undertakes any responsibility regarding them.

© 2016 Rajput Jain & Associates. All Rights Reserved | Sitemap

Call Email