Page Contents
IHI Corporation v. ADIT [Mumbai ITAT] ITA No. 7267 of 2012
Date of Decision: April 17, 2015
The assessee, a Japanese company, was a manufacturer of heavy machinery, providing technology oriented products and services to industrial, private and public sectors. It had been awarded Engineering, Procurement, Construction and Commissioning contracts by Petronet LNG Ltd. in India.
The assessee offered the income received from onshore activities to tax in India with the claim of applicability of India Japan tax treaty but had not offered income from offshore supply and offshore services to tax in India on the ground that income from offshore supply was not received in India, as its actual place of business was outside India and, hence, it had neither accrued or arisen in India.
The Appellate Tribunal held that the income from identical services rendered by the assessee in respect of the contract under consideration cannot be characterized differently.
The income from offshore services, though chargeable under section 9(1)(vii) but exempt under the DTAA, cannot be charged to tax in the light of section 90(2). It was further held that the provisions of section 90(2) is very clear that where the Central Government has entered into an agreement with the Government of any country outside India or specified territory outside India, as the case may be, under sub-section (1) for granting relief of tax, or as the case may be, avoidance of double taxation, then, in relation to the assessee to whom such agreement applies, the provisions of this Act shall apply to the extent they are more beneficial to that assessee.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances; Hope the information will assist you in your Professional endeavors. For query or help, contact: singh@carajput.com or call at 9555555480
Read our articles:
In today’s evolving financial ecosystem, fraud risks are becoming increasingly sophisticated, particularly in areas involving government-sponsored schemes and dormant bank… Read More
Compulsory disclosure of taxpayer Bank Balances in ITR‑4 CBDT has introduced a significant compliance requirement via Notification No. 45/2026 dated… Read More
CBDT Introduces New Procedure for PAN Correction In a parallel development under the new income tax framework, the Central Board… Read More
Overview of China's Tax System vs. India's Tax System Overall Structure Framework India: Federal dual-tax model, Center + state powers,… Read More
Key Tax Deducted at Source Compliance Issues under Section 194T Section 194T significantly increases compliance rigor by imposing gross-based, real-time… Read More
Income Tax Return Due Dates for FY 2025‑26 (AY 2026‑27) Timely filing of an income tax return ensures avoidance of… Read More
