Page Contents
Section 2(11) of the CGST Act defines assessment as the determination of tax liability under this Act and includes self-assessment, re-assessment, provisional assessment, summary assessment, and best judgment assessment.
The different types of assessment under GST are as under:
The taxable person is required to pay tax on the basis of self-assessment done by himself. Hence, all GST return filings are based on self-assessment by the taxpayer.
In this regard, a provision of Section 59 of the GST Act is reproduced hereunder:
“Every registered person shall self-assess the taxes payable under this Act and furnish a return for each tax period as specified under section 39.”
More reads:
GSTR enable details to be auto-populated in E-invoice GSTR-1
Blocking the E-way bill creation system if fails to file GSTR-3B
Step-1: The taxable person has to give, the concerned GST officer, a request for provisional assessment in writing.
Step-2: The GST officer on reviewing the application, will pass an order, within a period not later than ninety days from the date of receipt of the request, allowing payment of tax on a provisional basis or at a GST rate or on such value as specified by him.
Step-3: The taxable person, who is making payment on a provisional basis, has to issue a bond with security promising to pay the difference between the provisionally assessed tax and final assessed tax.
Step-4: The GST officer will pass the final assessment, with a period not exceeding six months from the date of communication of the order of provisional payment.
The time period for final assessment
GST Officers can scrutinize a GST return and related particulars furnished by the registered person to verify the correctness of the return. This is called a scrutiny assessment. In case there is any discrepancies noticed by the officer, he/she would inform the same to the registered person and seek his explanation on the same. On the basis of the explanation received from the registered person, the officer can take the following action:
When a taxable person fails to obtain GST registration even though liable to do so or whose registration has been canceled under section 29 (2) but who was liable to pay tax, the GST officer can proceed to assess the tax liability of such taxable person to the best of his judgment for the relevant tax periods and issue an assessment order within a period of five years from the date specified under section 44 for furnishing of the annual return for the financial year to which the tax not paid relates.
PRESUMPTIONS IN BEST JUDGEMENT ASSESSMENT IS NOT AN ARBITARY POWER
A GST Officer can on any evidence showing a tax liability of a person coming to his notice, proceed to assess the tax liability of such person to protect the interest of revenue and issue an assessment order if he has sufficient grounds to believe that any delay in doing so may adversely affect the interest of revenue. In order to undertake assessment under section 64, the proper officer is required to obtain previous permission of an additional commissioner or joint commissioner. Such an assessment is called a summary assessment.
The Honourable Bombay High Court stayed provisionally attached to bank accounts noting the assessee’s cooperation
Hon’ble Bombay High Court in case of AJE India Private Limited v. UOI & Ors. has stayed the order wherein assessee’s bank accounts were provisionally attached for recovering alleged tax dues and held that merely because there is a proceeding U/s 67 of the CGST Act, 2017. it would not mean that recourse to such a drastic power as given U/s 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 would be an automatic consequence, more so when Petitioner has cooperated with the investigation process. [Writ Petition (ST.) No. 97165 of 2020 decided on 22 December 2020]
The Honourable Gujarat High Court Grants regular bail to assessee arrested for offenses punishable U/s 132(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017
Honourable Gujarat High Court in the case of Idrish Yusufbhai Malvasi v. State of Gujarat & Ors. to grant a periodic bail to the MD of M/s. Mischat Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd., who was arrested primarily on charges of wrongfully availing of tax exemption by misapplying & misinterpreting the notifications of exemption issued by the Dept by actually using the company’s brand name and by willingly trying to suppress the facts. [R/Criminal error. Application No. 18320 of 2020 decided on December 10, 2020]
You may also like the following Blogs:
All about Financial Forensics & its Applications Financial Forensics and Forensic Audit Techniques Financial forensics and forensic audit techniques are… Read More
Code of Conduct in Forensic Audit: Introduction: A forensic audit is a specialized examination that investigates financial records to uncover… Read More
When is the cancellation revocation applicable? Procedure for Implement Revocation for GST cancellation This applies only if, on its own… Read More
Enhancement Made to the GST Portal - Significant Update Goods and Services Tax Network is pleased to inform that an… Read More
ITC Mismatch GSTR-2B vs GSTR-3B - DRC-01C Intimation under Rule 88D New mechanism to deal with Input Tax Credit mismatches… Read More
Hurdles with Hindu Undivided Family Dissolution: The Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) is a recognized legal entity under the Income-tax Act,… Read More