Page Contents
SECTION 43B
BUSINESS DISALLOWANCE – CERTAIN DEDUCTIONS TO BE ALLOWED ONLY ON ACTUAL PAYMENT
PF contribution : Where employee contributions were not deposited by assessee within due date as prescribed under P.F. Act., but same were made before due date of furnishing return under section 139(1), allowance of deduction of employees contribution to P.F under section 43B was justified – [2015] (Hyderabad – Trib.)
SECTION 80-IC
DEDUCTIONS – SPECIAL PROVISIONS IN RESPECT OF CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS OR ENTERPRISES IN CERTAIN SPECIAL CATEGORY STATES
Computation of deduction : Assessee company was not entitled to benefit of section 80-IC in respect of sales tax rebate obtained by it – [2015] 252 (Punjab & Haryana)
SECTION 92C
Comparables and adjustments/Comparables – Illustrations : In case of assessee, rendering IT enabled services to its AE, companies having related party transactions in excess of 25 per cent could not be accepted as comparables – [2015] (Delhi – Trib.)
SECTION 194A
Payment to statutory corporation : While making payment of interest by assessee-bank to NOIDA, a statutory corporation established under UP Industrial Area Development Act, 1976, tax was not required to be deducted at source – [2015] (Delhi – Trib.)
SECTION 148
Service of notice : In order to complete reassessment, notice under section 148 has to be mandatorily served upon assessee in accordance with section 282(1), read with Order V, Rule 12 CPC and Order III Rule 6 CPC –[2015](Delhi)
SECTION 263
Difference of opinion : Where on same set of evidence produced by assessee, Assessing Officer and Commissioner draw different opinions, such difference of opinion cannot be a basis to invoke jurisdiction under section 263 – [2015] (Chandigarh – Trib.)
SECTION 269T
LOANS DEPOSITS MODE OF TAKING OR ACCEPTING
Where assessee firm repaid loan amount in cash to another firm, in violation of provisions of section 269T, mere fact that one partner was common in both firms, it could not be taken as a case of inter-firm transactions and, therefore, penalty order passed under section 271E was to be confirmed – [2015] (Karnataka)
SECTION 292BB
NOTICE DEEMED TO BE VALID IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES
Where prior to completion of reassessment, assessee raised an objection that he had not been duly served in accordance with section 148, proviso to section 292BB was attracted and revenue could not take advantage of main portion of section 292BB – [2015] (Delhi)
Hope the information will assist you in your Professional endeavors. For query or help, contact: singh@carajput.com or call at 9555555480
More read for related blogs are:
New GST Advisory 2026: E-Invoicing Introduced for RCM Self-Invoices The GST Network, based on the recommendations of the GST Council… Read More
One Deadline Relaxed, Another Tightened: Four Key IBBI Circulars Every Insolvency Professional Must Know The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of… Read More
Direct Tax Collections FY 2026-27 (as on 14.10.2026) – Detailed Analysis The data compares Direct Tax collections up to 14… Read More
Key Provisions, Jurisdiction, Mediation under Commercial Courts Act 2015 Introduction The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 marked a significant reform in… Read More
GST Council Proposes Major Measures to Simplify Compliance The GST Council has recommended a series of reforms aimed at reducing… Read More
XBRL Applicability under the Companies Act, 2013 – Detailed Explanation XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) is a globally accepted electronic… Read More
