Page Contents
ICAI has formally announced that starting from April 1, 2026 (i.e. FY 2026–27), each chartered accountant—whether practicing individually or serving as a partner in a CA firm—will be limited to signing a maximum of 60 Income tax audit assignments u/s 44AB in a single FY. The objective behind the Move to prevent monopolization of audits by a few senior partners, Promote equitable workload distribution & Encourage healthy competition and professional integrity, and uplift audit quality by ensuring focus on each assignment. Key Highlights of the New Rule Implementation ICAI Guidelines:
No proxy signing: A partner cannot sign audit reports on behalf of another partner. Each must personally sign their own audits. Joint capacities across multiple firms are aggregated into the 60‑audit cap per individual
Firm-level impact: A firm with n partners can undertake up to 60 × n audits in total, provided each partner stays within their personal 60‑audit cap
No Sharing of Quota Across Partners: Senior partners cannot use junior partners’ quota. Each partner must personally sign and own up to their 60 audits.
Audit Assignment Record Maintenance: Every CA must maintain a register/log of audit assignments undertaken. Subject to scrutiny by ICAI and peer review mechanisms.
Compliance & Clarifications: ICAI will issue further clarifications to address implementation concerns. Disciplinary action may be taken in case of violations.
Improved audit quality: A lower cap ensures that each audit gets sufficient time and professional attention, helping to curb superficial or hurried audit practices
Workload equality: Prevents senior or name partners from monopolising tax audit work by using juniors’ auditor status—ensures fairer distribution across partners
Increased accountability: Each audit signed by a partner reflects their direct accountability, discouraging draft-and-forget mass sign-offs.
Entity Type | Audit Limit |
---|---|
Individual CA / Proprietor Firm | 60 Tax Audits per Financial Year |
CA Firm (Partnership/LLP) | 60 Tax Audits per partner per Financial Year (e.g., 3 partners = 180 max) |
The following do not count towards the 60-audit limit:
Audits under Section 44AD, 44ADA, and 44AE
Revised audit reports
Part-time partners are excluded from audit entitlement and computation
Area | Implication |
---|---|
Mid- to Large-sized Firms | May need to recruit more full-time partners to maintain audit volumes. |
Compliance | Must restructure workflow to assign audits within per-partner cap. |
Documentation | Strong internal systems to track audit assignments are essential. |
Partnership Structuring | Avoid “name-only” partners; only full-time partners qualify. |
The new cap was announced during a Global Capability Centres Summit hosted by ICAI. ICAI anticipates India will triple its GCCs to 5,000+ by 2027, employing over 80k CAs. ICAI is also working on creating a framework for overseas networking to help Indian firms evolve into domestic “Big Four” equivalents through global tie-ups. Draft guidelines for such tie-ups are under public consultation, with the comment deadline extended to July 16, 2025.
Action Area | Recommendation |
---|---|
Client Assignment Planning | Review and redistribute audit assignments so no partner exceeds 60 income tax audits. |
Internal Tracking | Implement reliable monitoring systems or software to track each partner’s audit count. |
Firm Structure | Consider adding or activating genuine partners if audit load exceeds capacity. |
Compliance | Avoid proxy signing and be ready to report counts per partner annually. |
Peer Review Readiness | Maintain robust documentation as the limit is now enforceable by disciplinary measures. |
Exceeding the cap can attract disciplinary action under the ICAI’s Second Schedule of CA Act, 1949. CA Firms must maintain records of each partner’s audit assignments & ensure transparency in assignments & sign-offs
In summary: Yes, your update is accurate. From 1 April 2026, ICAI will enforce a 60 income tax‑audit limit per partner in a CA firm. This applies strictly per individual not per firm & prohibits proxy signing. Clients, firms, and partners must therefore plan and allocate audits carefully to stay compliant and maintain audit quality.
Taxability Under GST for E-Commerce Sale of Services Definition & Models of E-Commerce Electronic Commerce (Section 2(44)): Supply of goods/services… Read More
For an under-construction house, the tax treatment of home loan interest is a bit different from a ready-to-move property. Interest… Read More
CBDT Extends Tax Exemption Window for SWFs & Pension Funds The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has officially extended… Read More
How Restricted Stock Units vs Employee Stock Options taxation in India Types of ESOPs & Related Stock-Based Incentives Employee Stock… Read More
GST rate on Hospitality Industry/ Hotel Rooms in India The hospitality & tourism industry in India is expected to rise… Read More
Why OIDAR is treated differently under GST Online Information Database Access and Retrieval (OIDAR) refers to services delivered over the… Read More