Basic Responsibilities & Liabilities of Forensic Auditor
- A forensic auditor must also be familiar with legal concepts and procedures, including the ability to differentiate between substance and form when grappling with any issue
- Help formulate recovery of funds misused and deriving the end beneficiary of diversion
- Preparing financial evidence and analysis and presenting in court against criminal activity
- Assisting in securing documentation necessary to support or rebut a claim
- Reviewing the factual situation and providing suggestions on alternative course of action
To Do’s by the Forensic Auditor
- A forensic auditor should Hint to be provided for further investigation in situation of limited evidence
- Match verbal indicators with physical behaviors during the Forensic Audit
- Forensic Audit Findings to be backed with evidences and support
- Disclaimers & Limitations to be disclosed with respect to the scope of work under Forensic Audit
- A forensic auditor should regularly follow up for data via emails
- Reverifying all the data disclosed in the Audit reports, stock statements, etc.
- A forensic auditor should maintain proper records of collected of data from the client and target.
- Developing a theory of the case during the Forensic Audit
- A forensic auditor should Necessary written communication/email with the borrower & client/target
Forensic Accounting and Investigation Standards (FAIS) issued by ICAI
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has issued the Forensic Accounting and Investigation Standards (FAIS) through its Digital Accounting and Assurance Board (DAAB). These standards provide a comprehensive framework for conducting forensic accounting and investigation engagements in a consistent, professional, and legally sustainable manner. The revised FAIS was released on 1 July 2023 and became mandatory for forensic engagements undertaken by ICAI members from that date onwards.
Forensic Auditing Standards issued By ICAI
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has released a set of forensic accounting and investigation standards in an effort to stop the growing problem of accounting, financial, and lending irregularities.
The auditor’s responsibilities in negotiating the details of the audit engagement with management are addressed under this Revised Standard on Auditing. The SA establishes the requirements for a forensic accounting and investigation audit and the terms of an audit engagement and amendments therein and separates the management’s and auditors’ responsibilities, among many other issues.
Purpose of FAIS
FAIS were introduced in response to the increasing incidence of:
- Accounting irregularities
- Financial frauds
- Loan defaults and fund diversion
- Corporate misconduct
- Money laundering and related financial crimes
The standards establish a structured methodology for carrying out forensic investigations and ensure that evidence collected during such assignments can withstand scrutiny by courts, regulators, and enforcement agencies.
Key Objectives of FAIS
The primary objectives of FAIS are:
- To establish minimum standards for conducting forensic accounting and investigation engagements.
- FAIS develops to enhance the quality, consistency, and credibility of forensic reports.
- To provide guidance to forensic professionals in planning, executing, documenting, and reporting investigations.
- FAIS originated to ensure uniformity in forensic practices across industries and sectors.
- To facilitate the collection and preservation of legally admissible evidence.
- FAIS to act as a benchmark for evaluating the performance of forensic professionals.
Stakeholders Benefited by FAIS
The standards are useful for various stakeholders, including:
- Banks and Financial Institutions
- Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
- Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI)
- Enforcement Directorate (ED)
- Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO)
- Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI)
- Economic Offences Wing (EOW)
- Corporate Entities
- Insolvency Professionals
- Courts and Tribunals
These stakeholders rely on forensic investigation reports for decision-making, regulatory actions, and legal proceedings.
Structure of FAIS
The standards are classified into six series:
| Series | Subject Matter |
| FAIS 100 Series | Key Concepts |
| FAIS-200 Series | Engagement Management |
| FAIS 300 Series | Execution of Assignments |
| FAIS-400 Series | Specialized Areas |
| FAIS 500 Series | Quality Control |
| FAIS-600 Series | Reporting |
The framework covers the entire lifecycle of a forensic engagement, starting from acceptance of the assignment and ending with the issuance of the final report.
Significance of FAIS
FAIS is significant because it:
- Promotes professional skepticism and objectivity.
- Establishes systematic procedures for fraud investigations.
- Enhances the reliability and defensibility of forensic reports.
- Provides consistency in investigation methodologies.
- Strengthens confidence among regulators, lenders, courts, and other stakeholders.
- Assists in uncovering fraud, corruption, asset misappropriation, fund diversion, and financial statement manipulation.
Standard-wise summary of all individual FAIS standards (FAIS 100 to FAIS 600 series)
FAIS 100 Series: Key Concepts
These standards establish the fundamental principles governing forensic accounting and investigation engagements.
FAIS 110 – Nature of Engagement
Objective: Defines what constitutes a forensic accounting and investigation engagement. following are key points:
- Distinguishes forensic engagement from statutory audit.
- Focuses on fact-finding and evidence gathering.
- Findings may be used in courts, tribunals, regulatory proceedings, and arbitration matters.
- The forensic professional reports findings and conclusions, not an audit opinion.
How is a forensic audit different from a statutory audit?
A statutory audit expresses an opinion on financial statements, whereas a forensic engagement investigates suspected wrongdoing and gathers legally defensible evidence.
FAIS 120 – Fraud Risk Assessment
- Objective: Identify fraud risks and red flags before commencing investigation.
- Covers: Risk identification, Fraud scenarios, Control weaknesses, likelihood assessment, and Impact assessment
- Practical Examples: Related-party transactions, Round-tripping, Bogus purchases, Diversion of funds and Fake vendors
- Importance: Acts as the foundation for planning the investigation.
FAIS 130 – Laws and Regulations
- Objective: Ensure compliance with applicable laws.
- Relevant Laws: Companies Act, 2013; Prevention of Corruption Act; PMLA; Indian Evidence Act; Information Technology Act; GST Laws; and FEMA
- Requirement: The forensic professional should understand the legal implications of evidence gathering and reporting
FAIS 140 – Applying Hypotheses
- Objective: Use investigative hypotheses to direct forensic procedures.
- Example: Hypothesis: “Management diverted company funds through shell companies.”
- The professional gathers evidence either to prove the hypothesis or to disprove the hypothesis.
- Benefit: Ensures a scientific and unbiased investigation approach.
FAIS 200 Series: Engagement Management
These standards deal with acceptance, administration, and management of forensic engagements.
FAIS 210 – Engagement Objectives
- Objective: Clearly define the Purpose, Expected outcomes, scope, and Deliverables
- Examples: Objectives may include Determining fraud amount, Establishing diversion of funds, identifying responsible persons. Quantifying damages.
- Importance: Prevents scope creep.
FAIS 220 – Engagement Acceptance and Appointment
- Objective: Determine whether to accept the assignment.
- Areas Evaluated: Independence, Competence, Resources, Conflict of interest, Ethical considerations
- Documentation: An engagement letter should contain scope, responsibilities, deliverables, timeline, and limitations.
FAIS 230 – Using Work of an Expert
- Objective: Guide use of specialists.
- Experts May Include cyberforensic experts, Handwriting experts, Valuation experts, Legal experts and Data analysts
- Responsibility: Even when experts are used, ultimate responsibility remains with the forensic professional
FAIS 240 – Engaging with Agencies
- Objective: Interaction with external agencies.
- Agencies like Banks, SFIO, CBI, ED, police authorities, and Regulators
- Focus: Proper communication, coordination, and evidence sharing.
FAIS 250 – Stakeholder Communication
- Objective: Manage communication with stakeholders.
- Stakeholders: Audit Committee, Management, Regulators, Banks and Law enforcement authorities
- Requirement: Communication must be factual, objective, and confidential.
FAIS 300 Series: Executing Assignments
Often considered the most important series for practical forensic work.
FAIS 310 – Planning the Assignment
- Objective: Develop an effective investigation plan. Includes: Investigation strategy, Resources, Timelines, evidence sources, and Risk areas
- Outcome: A documented investigation plan.
FAIS 320 – Evidence and Documentation
Objective: Obtain sufficient, reliable, and admissible evidence. The following are types:
- Documentary Evidence: Ledger accounts, vouchers, and Contracts
- Digital Evidence: Emails, server logs, and Mobile records
- Third-Party Evidence: Confirmations, Bank records
- Core Principle: If it is not documented, it is not done.
FAIS 330 – Conducting Work Procedures
- Includes Data analytics, Trend analysis, Ratio analysis, transaction tracing, and Beneficial ownership analysis
- Example: Tracing loan proceeds from Bank A → Company B → Related Party → Promoter Account.
FAIS 340 – Conducting Interviews
- Objective: Obtain information through structured discussions.
- Types: Witness interviews, employee interviews, and Suspect interviews
- Best Practices: Prepare questionnaires, document responses. Maintain neutrality and avoid intimidation.
FAIS 350 – Review and Supervision
- Objective: Ensure investigation quality.
- Includes: Review of evidence, Review of findings, Team supervision and Resolution of inconsistencies
- Importance: Reduces risk of incorrect conclusions.
FAIS 360 – Testimony
- Objective is to provide guidance when appearing before courts, tribunals, or arbitrators.
- Requirements: Present facts clearly, remain independent, support conclusions with evidence, and withstand cross-examination.
FAIS 400 Series: Specialized Areas
Designed for special and emerging forensic situations. The following are common areas covered:
- Digital Forensics: Mobile devices, Email evidence, server logs, and Cloud records
- Asset Tracing: Tracking Diversion of funds, Layering transactions, Benami holdings and Shell entities
- Anti-Money Laundering Investigations: Identification of Placement, Layering and Integration
- Litigation Support: Assistance in Damages claims, Arbitration and Commercial disputes
- Expert Witness Services: Professional opinions before legal forums.
FAIS 500 Series: Quality Control
The objective is to maintain consistency and reliability in forensic engagements. Key Components
- Leadership Responsibilities: Management should promote quality culture.
- Ethical Compliance: Ensure integrity, Objectivity, confidentiality, and Professional behavior
- Human Resources: Team must possess Skill, training, and Experience
- Monitoring: Periodic review of completed engagements.
- Documentation Review: Ensure all conclusions are properly supported
FAIS 600 Series: Reporting
The final output of the forensic assignment. This series governs reporting of findings and conclusions. Key Elements of Report
- Executive Summary: Why the assignment was conducted.
- Scope: What was examined.
- Methodology: How the investigation was performed.
- Findings: Facts identified.
- Evidence: Support for findings.
- Limitations: Restrictions encountered.
- Conclusions: Reasoned conclusions based on evidence.
- Annexures Like Interview notes, Transaction trails, and Supporting documents
Quick Revision Chart
| Series | Subject | Key Focus |
| FAIS 100 | Key Concepts | Nature, Fraud Risk, Laws, Hypothesis |
| FAIS-200 | Engagement Management | Acceptance, Objectives, Experts, Agencies |
| FAIS 300 | Execution | Planning, Evidence, Interviews, Review |
| FAIS-400 | Specialized Areas | Digital Forensics, AML, Asset Tracing |
| FAIS 500 | Quality Control | Supervision, Ethics, Monitoring |
| FAIS-600 | Reporting | Findings, Conclusions, Evidence |
Difference Between Statutory Audit and Forensic Audit
| Particulars | Statutory Audit | Forensic Audit |
| Objective | Express opinion on financial statements | Investigate fraud/suspicion |
| Scope | General | Specific |
| Skepticism Level | Normal audit skepticism | Very high skepticism |
| Evidence | Audit evidence | Legal evidence |
| Outcome | Audit opinion | Investigation report |
| Use | Shareholders | Courts, banks, regulators |
What at to Don’ts by the Forensic Auditor
- Incomplete/partial disclosures of limitations, clause and Disclaimers
- Forensic Auditor Don’t make assumptions
- Delay in submitting reports
- Forensic Auditor Should not be judgmental
- Collecting data illegally or without authorization
- Relying on data/information from unknown sources
- Submitting report without annexures
- Forensic Auditor Using the target’s computers to work
- No direct dependence on other work/report of Professionals
- Direct working on the original data
- Not maintaining confidentiality of the Forensic Audit
Guidelines on Forensic Audit issued by Authorities i.e RBI
| Declaring the company as fraudulent with reference to the circular: Criteria under which class is specified: RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Master Circular on Frauds Classification and Reporting 1 July 2015 | A company declared as a willful defaulter with reference to the circular: Criteria/under which class is specified: RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Master Circular on Wilful Defaulter 1 July 2015 |
| The Classifying the transaction resulting in fraud—RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Circular on Framework for dealing with loan frauds (Early Warning Signs) 7 May 2015 | Concluding the report pertaining to Fraud/ No Fraud—IBA Circular on Forensic Audit Report 11 June 2019 |
| Classifying the account due to non-cooperation—RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Circular on Non-Cooperative Borrowers 22 December 2014 |
Master Directions on Frauds—Classification & Reporting by banks & select Financial Institutions
Master Circular No. RBI/DBS/2016-17/28 DBS.CO.CFMC.BC.No.1/23.04.001/2016-17 dated 1st July
2016
Accounting and forensic auditing play a significant role in locating instances of fraud and corruption due to their distinct qualities as one of the particular professions in accounting. To combat the spread of corruption, several nations are now heavily implementing accounting and forensic audits. Businesses can greatly benefit from forensic audits and accounting implementation.
The Forensic Accounting and Investigation Standards (FAIS) issued by ICAI represent a pioneering initiative in the field of forensic accounting. They provide chartered accountants with a structured framework for conducting forensic engagements with professionalism, independence, objectivity, and due care. The standards serve as an important tool for combating corporate frauds and financial irregularities while ensuring that investigative findings are credible, consistent, and legally sustainable.
Forensic Audit Services & Application
With the worldwide increase in financial crimes, forensic auditing has become more crucial to ensure the financial growth of organisations and the economy. Some of the most popular areas to investigate in a forensic audit include the following:
- Extortion
- Corruption Incidents
- Possibility for conflict of interest
- Deceptive Financial Statements
- Misuse of assets
Our investigation uncovered irregularities in the concession’s awarding, but it did not turn up any proof that the syndicate of lenders’ equity or finances were used to pay bribes or participate in other illegal activity. Rajput Jain & Associates’ forensic audit Services provide one-stop support for all compliance-related support services.
- Rajput Jain & Associates also conducted a forensic audit, investigating thoroughly the company’s continuing operations (revenue and expenses), and made recommendations for improvements that the management of the company may make to the monthly and annual reporting to the syndicate. We are happy to assist you in following types of forensic Audit-like regulatory audit, Proprietary Audit, Investigative Audit, Data & Financial Audit, transaction audit, and Miscellaneous Audit
- Our strength lies in bringing together a team of highly qualified, skilled, and motivated professionals who are encouraged to lead, innovate, and excel. Rajput Jain & Associates are a team of professionals—CAs, CMAs, FAFDs, IT experts, and industry experts—with a combined experience of 50+ man-years.