Page Contents
ITAT clarifies that if TDS is deducted but not deposited by the employer, the employee (deductee) cannot be penalized. Two Powerful ITAT Judgments Now Make the Answer Clear: Recent decisions from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal have reinforced a major protection for taxpayers: TDS credit cannot be denied merely because of a mismatch in Form 26AS or the deductor’s failure to deposit tax. This brings long-awaited relief to thousands of taxpayers affected by CPC 143(1) adjustments.
Summarizing a landmark ruling by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on Section 205 protection regarding Tax Deducted at Source. Here’s a detailed breakdown: The ITAT has categorically held that once tax is deducted at source, the deductee cannot be asked to pay it again. Any failure to deposit TDS is the deductor’s default not the taxpayer’s.
Employer Dunzo Digital Pvt. Ltd. deducted ₹13.14 lakh TDS from salary but did not deposit it. CPC and CIT(A) denied the credit. ITAT overturned the denial, emphasizing that an employee cannot be penalized for the employer’s non-compliance. Section 205 squarely protects the deductee once tax has been deducted.
Over INR 96 lakh was deducted from professional receipts but not deposited by the deductor. ITAT Mumbai allowed the TDS credit despite the absence of 26AS reflection. The tribunal held that denial of credit results in double taxation, violating Section 205. Proof of deduction was held sufficient to claim credit.
The right to TDS credit is created the moment tax is deducted.
Form 26AS is not the sole determinant of credit eligibility.
Taxpayers will no longer be penalized due to the deductor’s non-compliance, financial distress, or insolvency.
Reinforces the principle that TDS is held in trust by the deductor on behalf of the government.
Section 205 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, states that where tax has been deducted at source, the assessee cannot be called upon to pay that tax again. Section 205 of the Income Tax Act expressly prohibits the Income Tax Department from recovering tax from you if it has already been deducted from your income. The liability to deposit TDS rests entirely with the deductor—not with the taxpayer. The rationale is clear The deductor acts as an agent of the government. Failure to remit TDS is the deductor’s default, not the taxpayer’s fault, & the tax dept must recover from the deductor, not the deductee.
However, the automated system may temporarily disallow the claim during ITR processing if the TDS does not reflect in Form 26AS/AIS, which may trigger a demand notice. In such cases, you must follow the process below to ensure the credit is allowed.
If entries are missing despite proof of salary deduction, Inform the employer and request immediate remedial action. Provide supporting evidence such as pay slips or bank statements. If the employer does not act, file a written complaint with your jurisdictional Assessing Officer (AO). AO details can be found on the Income Tax e-filing portal using the employer’s PAN.
The Income Tax Act imposes strict interest and penalties when a deductor (employer, company, or any payer) either fails to deduct TDS or deducts but does not deposit TDS on time. Interest Under Section 201A
| Default Under Section | Nature of Default | Interest Rate | Period of Levy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 201A | Failure to deduct TDS (fully or partly) | 1% per month | From the date the tax was deductible till the date of actual deduction |
| 201A | Failure to deposit TDS after deduction | 1.5% per month | From the date of deduction till the date of actual payment |
Interest must be paid before filing TDS returns or before settling any TRACES demand. & Interest paid for delayed TDS deposit is not allowable as a business expense under income tax laws.
Companies, whether government or private must also comply with quarterly TDS return filing deadlines.
Emphasizing that the middle class bears the highest tax burden while other sectors contribute relatively less. Key Points Highlights a perceived imbalance in India’s taxation system.
The system appears skewed, where The middle class consistently pays taxes. Other sectors benefit from exemptions, deductions, or loopholes. Raises concern about “brain drain” Emphasizes a “reality check”: the middle class pays, others navigate the system. Suggests need for income tax system optimization and reform
As the deductee (the taxpayer from whose income tax has been deducted), you are fully entitled to claim TDS credit even if the employer or deductor fails to deposit it with the government. If your employer deducted TDS but failed to deposit it, you still have the right to claim credit under Section 205. The mismatch in Form 26AS cannot be the sole reason for denial. following important points to remember in this regard:
But the deductor deposited TDS in a later year, leading to mismatch issues.
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India to Help Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams Enhance Accounting System significant development where Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams,… Read More
Understanding Clubbing of Income & Tax Logic Behind Gifting Assets Gifting money or assets to family members is a common… Read More
FSSAI Update for Food Businesses: Revised Turnover Thresholds Effective from 01.04.2026 The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)… Read More
Tax Alert in 15k to 20k cases: The ‘Swapped Provisions’ Trap via attempted to reduce their tax liability The Income… Read More
New UDIN Dashboard for Tax Audit Assignments (Effective from 1 April 2026) This blog explains the new Unique Document Identification… Read More
Key Fact Statement (KFS) for Home Loans: How This New RBI Rule Protects You from Hidden Charges Taking a Home… Read More