Categories: Gst Compliance

Challenges MSME face due to the accrual-based GST framework

Challenges MSME face due to the accrual-based GST framework.

GST on accrual basis hurting MSME/ Small businesses” highlights a significant challenge in India’s GST system for MSME/ Small businesses —the requirement to pay GST based on invoice issuance, not actual receipt of payment.

Accrual-Based GST is Squeezing Small Businesses’ Cash Flows

Bhagat pays Goods and Services Tax on every invoice, Owner raises—even if his/her clients don’t pay for months. The result: mounting pressure on working capital, forcing her to dip into savings or take short-term loans just to stay compliant. By year-end, nearly 3% of her revenue is lost to GST on unpaid invoices.

Each month, Bhagat is taxed on income she hasn’t actually received. Owner isn’t alone. Across India, small businesses are reeling under a cash flow crunch triggered by GST’s accrual-based structure, which requires tax to be paid when an invoice is issued—not when the payment is received.

How the GST Rule Works ?

GST Accrual Rule : Under the GST law, tax liability arises at the earlier of the invoice date or payment receipt. But in practice, payments often come 40 to 90 days after billing. For service-based businesses with few input costs to offset through Input Tax Credit, this means paying GST out-of-pocket well before revenue hits the bank account.

My payments are delayed by over 60 days after invoicing. Most of my expenses are salaries, which aren’t eligible for ITC, so I end up paying GST even before receiving a single rupee.

GST must be paid at the earlier of Date of invoice or Date of payment receipt. Clients often delay payments by 45–90 days, causing a cash flow burden on the seller. Sellers pay GST before receiving money → risk of unrecoverable tax on bad debts.

The Credit Note Dilemma :

When clients default, the only route for sellers to reverse GST liability is to issue a credit note for the unpaid amount. Experts saying that In the month of issuance, a credit note reduces GST liability for the seller. But this mechanism is riddled with complications:

  • Can only be used under strict conditions (e.g., goods returned, quality issues)
  • Not valid simply for non-payment
  • Buyer must reverse Input Tax Credit claimed on the original invoice
  • Invoice is treated as cancelled, barring the seller from pursuing legal recovery

Issuing a credit note means accepting that no supply took place—so legal recovery of dues becomes impossible, With the introduction of the Invoice Management System (IMS), sellers can now track whether a buyer has accepted or rejected a credit note. If no action is taken, it’s deemed accepted, and the buyer’s Input Tax Credit is auto-reversed via GSTR-2B. But many sellers still avoid credit notes due to legal and financial risks.

The 180-Day Rule: Another Pitfall

If payment isn’t received within 180 days of invoicing, Rule 37 of the CGST Rules mandates that buyers must reverse their Input Tax Credit. However, the seller still gets no GST refund—leading to what many call “tax on bad debt”.

Why Government Relief Options Fall Short

MSME Udyam Certificate : While it legally binds buyers to pay within 45 days, big corporations often sidestep this by Avoiding MSME/ Small businesses registered vendors and Citing “defective delivery” to delay payments

QRMP Scheme (Quarterly Returns, Monthly Payments) : Introduced in 2021 to reduce compliance for small businesses, it doesn’t help much:

  • Most large clients insist on monthly returns to claim Input Tax Credit promptly
  • Seller must still deposit GST monthly
  • Discrepancies between IFF filings and GSTR-3B often trigger tax scrutiny

We technically qualify for quarterly returns, but clients demand monthly filing for their ITC. So, the benefit of reduced compliance is lost,” says Vishal Jasani, co-founder of an advertising firm.

GST compliance Timeline Overview

  1. By 11th of next month → File GSTR-1 to declare sales
  2. By 20th of next month → File GSTR-3B, pay GST & claim Input Tax Credit
  3. If buyer delays beyond 180 days → Input Tax Credit must be reversed, but seller gets no refund.
  4. If buyer defaults → No mechanism for seller to claim GST refund on bad debt.

Can a Credit Note Help?

How It Works  : Seller can issue a credit note for unpaid dues. and Proportionate GST is reversed on the credit note.

Different Challenges from Affected Business Owners:

  • Payment cycles > 60 days
  • Most expenses are employee-related → little Input Tax Credit
  • 3% revenue lost in GST on unrecoverable debts
  • Needs to borrow capital 3–4x to manage GST + cash flow
  • Pricing structure can’t absorb this inefficiency

Other Challenges

  • Credit notes can only be issued in limited cases.
  • GST credit reversal by buyer is hard to track.
  • Invoice becomes void, affecting seller’s ability to recover dues legally.

Policy Reforms Urgently Needed  :

Our Suggested Reform Recommendation

  • GST should be on actual receipt basis for small businesses, After proof of non-payment, GST refund should be allowed without needing credit notes. Core Issue: The burden of paying GST upfront—even before receiving payment—falls on the seller.
  • Allow small businesses to pay GST on a receipt basis, not accrual, especially under a specified turnover threshold. This would align tax liabilities with real income and protect MSME/ Small businesses from tax on bad debts. Small businesses and tax professionals suggest moving to a cash-based GST system—at least for firms below a certain turnover threshold.
  • GST should be paid only on actual receipt of payment, not just on invoice. That would reduce the risk of paying tax on income never received. If a client doesn’t pay even after repeated follow-ups, a simple process for GST reversal—without needing a credit note—must be introduced.
  • India’s GST regime was designed to be efficient, but its accrual structure is increasingly punishing small businesses. With delayed payments, no GST refunds on bad debts, and impractical remedies like credit notes, the compliance burden far outweighs the benefits. The government must explore receipt-based GST payments, especially for MSME/ Small businesses, to align tax liability with actual cash flow. Until then, entrepreneurs like Bhagat will continue to pay taxes on money they never earn.
Rajput Jain & Associates

Rajput Jain & Associates is a Chartered Accountants firm, with it's headquarter situated at New Delhi (the capital of India). The firm has been set up by a group of young, enthusiastic, highly skilled and motivated professionals who have taken experience from top consulting firms and are extensively experienced in their chosen fields has providing a wide array of Accounting, Auditing, Taxation, Assurance and Business advisory services to various clients and their stakeholders. Rajput jain & Associates, a professional firm, offers its clients a full range of services, To serve better and to bring bucket of services under one roof, the firm has merged with it various Chartered Accountancy firms pioneer in diversified fields. We have associates all over India in big cities. All our offices are well equipped with latest technological support with updated reference materials. We have a large team of professionals other than our Core Team members to meet the requirements of our prospective clients including the existing ones. However, considering our commitment towards high quality services to our clients, our team keeps on growing with more and more associates having strong professional background with good exposure in the related areas of responsibility.

Recent Posts

Mandatory ITR Filing Requirement Cases for AY 2025–26

Mandatory ITR Filing Requirement Cases for the AY 2025–26: Filing your Income Tax Return (ITR) is not only a statutory… Read More

3 weeks ago

Tax Exemption & Deduction for Army Personnel AY 2025–26.

Income Tax Exemptions and Deductions for Army Personnel (AY 2025–26) Army personnel, like all salaried taxpayers, are liable to pay… Read More

3 weeks ago

Understanding PF Withdrawal vs. Pension (EPS) Claim

Understanding PF Withdrawal vs. Pension (EPS) Claim How employees often withdraw their Employees Provident Fund but ignore the Employees’ Pension… Read More

4 weeks ago

Guideline for ITR Compulsory Selection for Complete Scrutiny

Guidelines for Compulsory Selection of Returns for Complete Scrutiny – FY 2025-26 The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has… Read More

4 weeks ago

Key Difference in TDS Section 192 vs. Section 194J

Key Difference in TDS Section 192 Vs. Section 194J Understanding the difference between Section 192 and Section 194J is crucial… Read More

4 weeks ago

ITR form appropriate for AY 2025-26 based on income sources

ITR form is appropriate for them for AY 2025-26 based on their income sources &  taxpayer category. Income Tax Return… Read More

1 month ago
Call Us Enquire Now